Unmasking Deception: The Alarming Misconduct of Judge Charlene Jackson and Her Fraudulent LinkedIn Profile

A Call for Law Enforcement Action on LinkedIn Misconduct

One of the most alarming acts of misconduct attributed to Judge Charlene Jackson involves her appropriation of another individual's LinkedIn profile, which she is misrepresenting as her own. This situation calls for a thorough investigation by law enforcement to address the serious nature of the allegation. Authorities can issue a subpoena or warrant to access the LinkedIn account, which would confirm that Jackson made edits to her profile herself several months ago, indicating that her account was not compromised or hacked.

Here are screenshots of Judge Charlene Jackson's fraudulent LinkedIn profile: Page 1, Page 2, Page 3, and Page 4.

Here are screenshots of the real owners LinkedIn profile Page 1, Page 2, Page 3, and Page 4 and Page 5.

Judge Jackson's deceptive LinkedIn profile included false claims about her employment with prestigious brands like Gucci and Dolce & Gabbana, as well as inaccuracies regarding her educational background. While she simultaneously identifies as a Maricopa County Superior Court Judge, these misrepresentations suggest a troubling lack of integrity and honesty. Such actions could potentially lead to serious legal implications, including fraud, identity theft, and impersonation. 


It appears that Jackson may have altered her LinkedIn profile to obscure previous associations with colleagues or employers, particularly after facing scrutiny for not disclosing her personal relationships with litigants and attorneys in her courtroom.


Judge Jackson's Rapid Profile Alterations: A Red Flag for Ethical Standards in the Judiciary


Judge Jackson swiftly removed some of the fraudulent elements from her LinkedIn profile after a letter disclosing Jacksons’ conduct was disseminated to the Arizona Supreme Court Justices and other relevant authorities.This swift action could be interpreted as an attempt to obscure evidence of misconduct.Screenshots documenting the discrepancies have been captured, showcasing both her altered profile and that of the legitimate owner. This incident further exemplifies Judge Jackson's attempts to conceal her misconduct, raising significant questions about her integrity and accountability in her judicial role.


This incident further underscores a pattern of behavior where Judge Jackson seems to be concealing evidence of her misconduct. This incident further underscores a pattern of behavior where Judge Jackson seems to be concealing evidence of her misconduct, raising further questions about her accountability and ethical standards.


Learn more about Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Charlene Jackson here.


Please consider supporting us by signing our Change.org Petition to Remove Judge Charlene Jackson from the Maricopa County Superior Court.


Location: Maricopa County, AZ, USA

Comments

  1. AnonymousNovember 13, 2024 at 11:14 AM

    A judge stealing someone elses linkedin profile should be automatically stripped of her judicial powers. Judge Jackson is displaying signs of mental illness.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousNovember 13, 2024 at 6:10 PM

    Jackson is a dirty pig

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousNovember 14, 2024 at 9:10 PM

    Impersonating someone else is a class 6 felony

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Ethical Dilemma: Judge Jackson's Oversight of Her Niece's Case Raises Serious Questions

Exposing Conflicts of Interests and Judge Charlene Jackson's Family Connection in Court Cases Maricopa County Family Court Judge Charlene Jackson is currently assigned to her niece's family court case but did not remove it from her docket after I lodged a complaint with the Commission on Judicial Conduct (CJC). Paige Brianne Jackson-Moore, Judge Jackson's niece, has a well-documented history of living at the same addresses as Judge Charlene Jackson, even during periods when she had outstanding warrants related to various criminal cases. Given that Paige is often represented by Attorney Chris Love, a close associate of Charlene Jackson, it is reasonable to conclude that Judge Jackson was aware of the existence of multiple active warrants for her niece over the years. Evidence of Judge Charlene Jackson and Paige Jackson's relationship. The relationship between Judge Jackson and Paige is further evidenced by family photographs that show them together, highlighting their cl...
Read more

Arizona Family Court Judge has a history of violating parents rights

An investigation consisting of interviews with parents, family members, lawyers, and a review of legal documents reveal Judge Charlene D. Jackson has established a record of violating parents' rights during her short time on the bench.    On October 14, 2022, Charlene D. Jackson was appointed to serve as a Maricopa County Superior Court Judge by former Governor Doug Ducey. Two years later, litigants have had enough of being abused, tormented, traumatized, and retaliated against by Jackson.    Jacksons' controversial tenure reportedly devastated families, infuriated attorneys and calls the reputation of many into question including the Family Court Presiding Judge Ronda Fisk, Superior Court Presiding Judge Joseph Welty, the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct and the Arizona Judiciary as a whole.    Parents claimed their children were taken away from them before they even had an opportunity to address Jackson's court or present evidence to answer alleg...
Read more

The Silent Scandal: Judge Jackson's Controversial Practice of Muting FTR Recordings

Judge Charlene Jackson's Alarming Habit of FTR Muting Threatens Judicial Integrity in Maricopa County In several instances, Maricopa County Judge Charlene Jackson has inappropriately muted the For The Record (FTR) recordings to express opinions that she is aware violate legal standards and breach the Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct. These remarks, made during court sessions, should have been part of the official record. However, by muting the recordings, Judge Jackson has sought to shield herself from judicial scrutiny, thereby undermining the litigants' right to a complete and accurate account of the proceedings for potential review. The ability of litigants to access a complete record is essential for ensuring fairness and upholding the integrity of the legal system. In one particular case, Judge Jackson muted the FTR and disclosed that she had "personal motives" regarding the matter at hand. Attorneys present submitted sworn affidavits detailing what they heard Ja...
Read more