Judge Charlene Jackson's Tenure Under Scrutiny: A Call for Accountability in the Maricopa County Superior Court

Judge Charlene Jackson's Resume Conflicts Demand Immediate Attention and Action

Reports suggest that Judge Charlene Jackson's tenure at the Maricopa County Superior Court marks her 14th or 15th judicial role, a significant increase of about 7 to 8 positions compared to what she has officially stated on her Maricopa County Court Resume. A variety of resumes and bios attributed to Judge Jackson can be found online, particularly for speaking engagements and other professional opportunities; however, many of these documents present conflicting information. After discrepancies were highlighted on social media, Judge Jackson took steps to remove her online profiles in an apparent attempt to conceal her inconsistencies.

You can view some of Judge Charlene Jackson's resumes here

The situation casts doubt on the veracity of Judge Jackson's statements in Jackson's initial application for the position of Maricopa County Judge. If it is determined that a judge has been dishonest in their application process, it raises serious ethical questions and should lead to immediate removal from the bench, along with potential criminal charges. The integrity of the judicial system relies on the honesty of its members, and any breach of trust must be addressed.


Arizona law clearly prohibits filing false disclosures, committing perjury, and submitting a false instrument for filing, and these laws must be upheld without exception, whether the individual in question is a judge or an ordinary citizen. The implications of such violations are significant, as they undermine public confidence in the judicial system. It is crucial that accountability measures are enforced to ensure that all judges adhere to the highest ethical standards of honesty and integrity.


The Arizona Supreme Court, along with the Commission on Judicial Conduct and Judge Jackson's supervisors, Judge Ronda Fisk and Judge Joseph Welty, have yet to respond to the growing number of ethical and misconduct complaints against Judge Jackson. This inaction raises serious concerns about the integrity of the entire Arizona judiciary.


The State of Arizona needs to remove their Criminal Judges off the bench, starting with Maricopa County Family Court Judge Charlene D. Jackson-Etnire.


Please consider supporting us by signing our Change.org Petition to Remove Judge Charlene Jackson from the Maricopa County Superior Court.



Location: Maricopa County, AZ, USA

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Ethical Dilemma: Judge Jackson's Oversight of Her Niece's Case Raises Serious Questions

Exposing Conflicts of Interests and Judge Charlene Jackson's Family Connection in Court Cases Maricopa County Family Court Judge Charlene Jackson is currently assigned to her niece's family court case but did not remove it from her docket after I lodged a complaint with the Commission on Judicial Conduct (CJC). Paige Brianne Jackson-Moore, Judge Jackson's niece, has a well-documented history of living at the same addresses as Judge Charlene Jackson, even during periods when she had outstanding warrants related to various criminal cases. Given that Paige is often represented by Attorney Chris Love, a close associate of Charlene Jackson, it is reasonable to conclude that Judge Jackson was aware of the existence of multiple active warrants for her niece over the years. Evidence of Judge Charlene Jackson and Paige Jackson's relationship. The relationship between Judge Jackson and Paige is further evidenced by family photographs that show them together, highlighting their cl...
Read more

Arizona Family Court Judge has a history of violating parents rights

An investigation consisting of interviews with parents, family members, lawyers, and a review of legal documents reveal Judge Charlene D. Jackson has established a record of violating parents' rights during her short time on the bench.    On October 14, 2022, Charlene D. Jackson was appointed to serve as a Maricopa County Superior Court Judge by former Governor Doug Ducey. Two years later, litigants have had enough of being abused, tormented, traumatized, and retaliated against by Jackson.    Jacksons' controversial tenure reportedly devastated families, infuriated attorneys and calls the reputation of many into question including the Family Court Presiding Judge Ronda Fisk, Superior Court Presiding Judge Joseph Welty, the Arizona Commission on Judicial Conduct and the Arizona Judiciary as a whole.    Parents claimed their children were taken away from them before they even had an opportunity to address Jackson's court or present evidence to answer alleg...
Read more

The Silent Scandal: Judge Jackson's Controversial Practice of Muting FTR Recordings

Judge Charlene Jackson's Alarming Habit of FTR Muting Threatens Judicial Integrity in Maricopa County In several instances, Maricopa County Judge Charlene Jackson has inappropriately muted the For The Record (FTR) recordings to express opinions that she is aware violate legal standards and breach the Arizona Code of Judicial Conduct. These remarks, made during court sessions, should have been part of the official record. However, by muting the recordings, Judge Jackson has sought to shield herself from judicial scrutiny, thereby undermining the litigants' right to a complete and accurate account of the proceedings for potential review. The ability of litigants to access a complete record is essential for ensuring fairness and upholding the integrity of the legal system. In one particular case, Judge Jackson muted the FTR and disclosed that she had "personal motives" regarding the matter at hand. Attorneys present submitted sworn affidavits detailing what they heard Ja...
Read more